I’ve written two new features for issue 7 of Smart Transport, considering the UK’s race to reallocate road space, and the challenges for transport in rural areas.
Read moreSome good news
Last week I heard formally that I’ve been awarded a fellowship by the Foundation for Integrated Transport. I’m really grateful to have some time to pursue some of the research that falls outside my consultancy in a bit more depth.
A few months ago I started writing a paper for rural mobility workshop for the University of Hertfordshire’s Smart Mobility Unit. I got knee-deep in data looking at travel patterns between central Manchester and the Greater Manchester urban areas, and it just got more interesting. I wrote a proposal for the Foundation to give me some time to do more analysis (not just data, but lived experience as well) and I’m fortunate to have been awarded a fellowship to study it more deeply. It’s a real honour.
Some of the things I will be looking at include:
Data analysis of 6 suburban/peri urban areas in Greater Manchester to show car vs other commuter patterns.
How often is transport given a high accessibility score at both origin and destination? To what extent does this correlate with public transport use / car driving?
I hope to create some detailed profiles of the areas and examine:
More granular mapping of transport accessibility index
Select some key journeys and analyse possible transport routes, costs and timings. Do they support the accessibility indices?
Compare with experience based profiling (eg connectivity / interchange times are not included in the indices) plus walking time and infrastructure for walking.
Analyse these routes against current deregulated and also commissioned services.
Analyse whether new demand responsive transport and micromobilty modes would improve connections between people’s origins and destinations. Could they reduce the need for car journeys and make MaaS possible? What are the cost implications and benefits for local authorities?
I’m hoping that this time will allow me to do some thinking about better data on pavements too as safe active travel routes will be one of the important components for any MaaS platforms to be useful.
I presented a summary of my thinking (pre the fellowship to FISITA recently - you can read it here.
And below is what I like to think of as the start of my mapping adventures. I hope it will become more complex and sophisticated in time.
Congratulations too to fellow FIT fellows Alistair Kirkbride and Jonathan Tyler. You can read more about our fellowships here.
Please do get in touch if you’d like to follow this project. I am hoping it will be something that will contribute to the wider discussion of Mobility as a Service.
New mobility in a crisis?
I was asked for my thoughts about the impact of the COVID19 crisis on mobility as a service and future transport by Sandra Witzel of Skedgo. Here’s what I said:
I think that the widespread social distancing and lockdown measures have two main impacts.
The first is pretty obvious; reduced demand. We can see the impact of working from home and people on furlough on transport data trackers such as Citymapper’s index. Demand for online ordering and delivery has rocketed and we’re seeing the replacement of shopping trips by delivery on a grand scale.
The second is that as the roads empty, there is more room for cycling and walking (and indeed to maintain social distancing we need wider pavements). Bike share and e-bikes have stepped up to help NHS and other key workers make their essential journeys. Other shared transport providers - Liftshare, HiyaCar, Zipcar are all stepping in. Even tech enabled taxi services are creating fare plans for essential workers.
Whilst the immediate impacts are very much to reduce public transport (which is at the core of MaaS) this may not be a long term impact.
There will be direct and indirect consequences of the crisis - at the same time as we are released to travel, the economic impact may well be being felt. People - many of whom have barely used their cars for months - may well look to shed the costs of car ownership as they feel the pinch. It’s hard to predict at present but this may well play out as increasing demand for forms of MaaS, smart transport and new mobility.
Disruption is the mother of transport behaviour change. Not only must we not assume that we will pick up where we left off, but we must also actively work to shape the new behaviours which will form in future.
Having read the full article, there are many people trying to ensure the future is shaped so that it doesn’t repeat the mistakes of the past.
Here in Calderdale I’ve set up a volunteer e-cargobike delivery service. More about this later.
Guest blog: Schoolkids, smart cards and bus cuts
Photo by Flickr user Firstbusphotos, Creative Commons licence
Antony de Heveningham examines the reasons for cuts to local bus services, and comes up with a novel culprit.
Read moreConnectivity joins the dots
I’ve contributed an article to issue 5 of Smart Transport magazine which examines the possibilities created by the new generation of connected vehicles, from shared ownership and “car club-ready” vehicles, to risk management and fleet data.
Interview for Skedgo's "Women in Maas" series
I was interviewed by mobility service provider Skedgo as part of their regular series “Women in MaaS”. I spoke about the need for open data in MaaS, its relationship with existing public transport, and how it can be introduced in rural areas.
Read the full interview here.
Meet Snowflake...
I live in a small, semi-rural town in the north of England. And I have just admitted to myself that I can’t quite do all the things I want to do without a car.
Read moreThe changing world of Mobility as a Service (and how to keep up)
The Annual Survey of Mobility as a Service is now in its third year. Whatever your work in transport, either as a planner, providing public transport, bike share, car hire, leasing, payments, operational support, TRANStech please complete the survey to gauge how MaaS – and our hopes and fears for it – are developing.
Read moreNarrative and new mobility
I’ve watched the ebbing fortunes of the ‘bike share unicorns’ - notably ofo and Mobike - with concern over the past year. Their cheery growth, rapidly scattering thousands of orange and yellow bikes across UK cities seemed like a magic solution to get more people cycling without costing cities a fortune. But their equally rapid retraction holds lessons for all sorts of new mobility.
Read moreBikes, bubbles, canaries and crashes
My attention was drawn to an interesting piece of bike industry news from China today.
Chinese bike manufacturers are reporting significant drops in turnover as a result of bike share companies shrinking. Like, really significant – ofo supplier, the Shanghai Phoenix Enterprise (Group) Co Ltd, experienced a 55% drop in turnover and net income in the first six months of this year.
Read moreMan* cannot travel by FirstGroup alone
The announcement today that FirstGroup has reported a £356m loss along with change at the top of the transport group provoked me to recall three key statistics which stood out when researching this year's Annual Survey of Mobility as a Service.
Read moreComments on the Transport for the North Strategic Transport Plan
Whilst the desire to upgrade and enhance the rail offer for the North is welcome and not before time, along with an emphasis on simplified and best value ticketing, I fear that insufficient attention has been paid to the potential for behaviour change, active travel, transport data and novel forms of transport to make an impact on the plans for the road network, which potentially renders them inappropriate or irrelevant.
Read more